Canadian Sikhs To Rally Against The Ku Klux Klan This Sunday

ABBOTSFORD, Canada—After the distribution of racist flyers in Abbotsford, Canada, by the Ku Klux Klan (an American violent and racist terror group), the Sikh community there is joining up with the Coalition Against Bigotry for a public rally this Sunday.

The demonstration, coined Rally Against Racism & Bigotry, will take place from 12.30pm on Sunday 22 January, beginning at the site of the GurSikh Temple.

The Gurdwara Sahib was chosen to be the rallying point as the heritage Gurdwara was established during it’s conception as part of a struggle against racism and colonialism in the year 1911.

Gurpreet Singh, the local organizer said, “That is what Sikh Gurus have taught us, to stand up against oppression and inequality. Right from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh ji, all of them challenged power and bigotry.”

Since Trump’s election, Canada has seen a number of cases of racist literature being distributed in public places. This latest incident involved literature making derogatory marks against Martin Luther King Jr.

 

43 COMMENTS

  1. Khalsa Jio,
    Nevermind about trump ji, disregard my post above. I heard he is introducing martial law etc unrealistic actions, and his wife and son living separate as son has mental issues…Guru Nanak Dev Jio kirpa dya baksheesh_/\_scary situation for world jio, ardas kirpa jio_/\_

  2. Gurfathe Khalsa Jio_/\_, I have experienced hate, and researched, and confirmed that the REAL HATERS ARE AFRICAN AMERICANS IN COLLABORATION WITH RSS HINDS, as the white community are only fed up with the bad publicity Trump is getting before he was even inaugurated.
    SO AS GURBANI REMINDS STAY FOCUSED ON SADEY GURBANI ATEY NAAM, and SPREADING LOVE AS OUR GURU SAHIBAANS DID SO TRUTH KHALSA (PURE HEARTED SOULS OF EVERY RACE OF ONE GOD/ VAHIGUROO JIO) RAJ WILL BE A REALITY JIO!_/\_
    GIVE TRUMP AND WHITE COMMUNITY ALL THE SUPPORT AND UNDERSTANDING, THAT WE DO NOT STAND WITH HATE AND DIVISION BUT TO BUILD A KHALSA WORLD FOR GOOD OF ALL VAHIGUROO GOD AKAL PURAKH CREATION JIO_/\_
    I would appreciate an update by sikh24.com about meeting, which my ardas is worked in mutual understanding as per my request above jio_/\_

  3. Oh Sachay Singho, stop wasting your breath with online trolls. Go do seva at the local Gurudawara. Forget the BMW, get new Bushmaster AR-15’s for the whole family and join the local gun range and take your kids with you, so they can learn what it means to be a Saint Soldier. Sikhs are found in every corner of the world; Khalsa “rule” over the world already! Look at the Scientists, Engineers, Business people, Leaders, Athletes, the list is endless. Look at who has defended India by the defeating the Moghuls, to ousting the British,to winning the great wars, to liberating India, to the Green Revolution, to spreading love and compassion to every corner of the world. Despair not we have Victory in every breath we take!

    • Rajagopal Krishnan, Reasonable Soul and RSS Harinder are trolling this site in order to demoralise Sikhs by presenting falsehood as truth. If their hypocritical lies are not firmly rebutted they might just put seed of doubt in the mind of one faltering Sikh. That is why I answer them and they cannot respond.

      • Ahaha, M. Singh is on very important holy mission answering few forum comments. Who knows what would happen if M. Singh was not here? Yes, most of poster are RSS, even M. Singh was employee of Indian Government as he himself mentioned. Truth cannot be denied no matter how many lies you spread. Now new fake lie made by M. Singh, that I claimed Shiva wielded khanda. Never I said such thing. Khanda is holy sword of Shiva. As stated before which M. Singh did not understand, new questions M. Singh keep asking from his teacher I will answer after 2 months, first I gave homework assignment to him for the remedial lessons, so questions less stupid. Then we will check competency level which currently is zero. Even hindu atheism, he never even heard of such thing does not understand despite such long history and so many books on topic. Much study needed by Moron Singh.

      • Khandas is not a sword or a holy sword you fool let alone one used by Shiva! Khanda is a Sikh military emblem composing two kirpans and a chakkar. Shiva’s weapon of choice is a trishul – this is a trident not even a sword! Is that what it means to be atheist Hindu – not to know anything about the religion you don;t even believe in?! ‘Atheist Hindu’ is just western euphemism for ‘hypocrite – you find it embarrassing to admit to pagan beliefs in the west so you make up your own contorted description to excuse yourself from goras laughing at you.

      • Trishul is not a sword, why you brought in trishul into this discussion. I never mentioned trishul, this is done by you only. I mention sword, immediately you are discussion of trishul and of wielding? Craziness or intentional lying, think please. Khanda is a sword. Khanda Sikh symbol, has main weapon of khanda sword. Everyone knows this, not complicated. Khanda has been worship by hindus since ancient times, meanwhile Moron Singh thinks khanda is Sikh only, trying to spread wisdom to teacher. ;-) Even hindus have swords, yes, Hindus must be given credit also as khanda is Hindu in origin not Sikh. Even before, I taught you Sikh Khanda symbol made of different weapons, you could not understand and jumped to trishul suddenly, crazy. Even if you do not like “atheist Hindu,” does not matter as whether you like or not there are many, no hypocrisy as I have stated clearly which belief I do not follow as allowed and accepted under Hindu doctrine. I never agree with any Hindu doctrine in violation of atheist belief, thus definition of hypocrisy not relevant, please see definitions so you understand words coming out of your head. This is why I have given you two months reading time to study on topic which you cannot understand, but maybe not ignorance only low intelligence also a problem for you, this may be you need a teacher to do thinking for you, sadly you have fallen into trap of teacher who has given you belief in supernatural. May be one day you will even die to defend zero evidence supernatural belief. I am helping you avoid such fate and wrong decisions caused by baseless beliefs, response of M. Singh is to insult and lie. Let us not fight, there is no need for such acrimony. Yes it is hurtful to your ego if you are not special person as you thought but let us move past ego and embrace love of hindu nation so we may all live in peace and prosperity.

  4. No answer from the troll to your highly valued information given M Singh Ji – perhaps you have confused him more now! Stay in Chardi Kala!!!

  5. it would be a bramin bodi! Dastars are crowns and not hats which hindu rss fail to recognise now whilst the whole world recognise SIKHS!

    • Why Sikhs always offended even by offhand comment? Hat is a covering for the head. Is turban a covering for the head? Then if so, turban is a type of hat. Accept the reality. You may disagree with this but seem reasonable to me. Always some problem with Sikhs. Now Satinder Singh think some conspiracy going on, Jagbir Singh think joke being done on him, Surinder Kaur trying attack on Hindus, always Sikh overreaction. Let us all do prayers and have peace. Or this offends also?

      • Already tried to explain to you difference between turban and dastaar but you are refusing to accept knowledge and sticking with bigoted ignorance. But yes, it is good that you wish to follow Sikh ethos of live and let live, so we can all do prayers in our own way and have peace. Although having said that you claim to be an atheist so who are you praying to exactly?

      • Finally good question from M Singh, although should be obvious to everyone, only you do not know. Meditations have many physical benefits as have been shown in medical studies, mainly relief of stress. You should try some time. Buddhists have perfected the atheist prayers, of course you know nothing of these either.

      • If it is good question why cant you answer it? hy don;t you explain to me how you claim to be both a ‘monotheistic Hinud’ and an atheist at the same time? How you manage it. On the first day of week you go to mandir and rub belly of the hybrid mutant elephant boy and ask for money. Then next day you curse yourself for believing in deities and go out and rob a Sikh. Day after return to mandir and ask Ganesh for forgiveness for not believing in Him and thanking him for money then off to see Kali to ask her to satisfy your lust. Next day again you remonstrte with yourself for ever believing in deities once more and now havoing no belief in divinity you indulge your bestial nature because you fear no karmic consequences and go out and rape some woman, child or animal. Next day back to the mandir to beg forgiveness again? Is that how it goes? Sounds like schizophrenia to me or perhaps your desire for some veneer of religiosity is just a show of respectability and actually you are following the noted satanist Crowley’s ‘Do what thou wilt’ theosophy? After all you are already half there with your in / out belief in demons like Ravan, eh? And what do you do with your atheists monotheist Hindu belief on the seventh day? Take the day off, maybe dress in women’s clothes and dance about like a khusra? That way you could again indulge your conflicted psychology by saying you are both gay and not gay at the same time. And what ‘sword’ Shiva wields again? That’s right, it is not sword but trishul, now you know something of Hinduism, keep up the meditation as it will help your stress that your medications can’t keep under control anymore.

      • I am not monotheist hindu and never claimed it. You are inventing stories again due to turban blocking view of computer screen.

      • You have claimed to be an atheist and a Hindu all at the same time and have claimed that Hinduism is not just polytheist but can be monotheist as well. I know it is difficult to keep track of how many lies you are telling but unfortunately for you every word you type is there for all to read. This is a website not RSS history book where you rewrite as you go along.

      • M Singh: “You have claimed to be an atheist and a Hindu all at the same time and have claimed that Hinduism is not just polytheist but can be monotheist as well.” This is all true, as educated people would know. However you also state: “hy don;t you explain to me how you claim to be both a ‘monotheistic Hinud’ and an atheist at the same time?” Never claimed to be a monotheist hindu. This you made up lie. You still do not understand? Lack of knowledge is blocking your comprehension.

      • I stand corrected. You are right, when I look back at your entry which let’s be honest is rather rambling ‘Rajagopal Krishnan January 20, 2017 at 1:55 pm it states ‘Did you know some hindus are atheists even? I have been explaining to you all this time that I am hindu atheist. Many hindu polytheists, but also many hindu monotheists as well and hindu atheists like myself.’ But the question I have posed remains valid. How can you be an atheist and a Hindu (whether polytheist or monotheist – the latter being dubious at best) who believes in deity puja at the same time? Tell me how you can believe in negative and positive views at same time and hold both opposing views to be true?

      • M Singh, where you jump to conclusion again? You keep jumping then have to go back and admit mistake once more. Yes you stand corrected, also immediately once more new lie from M Singh has come again. Where I said I do deity puja? Show me this deity puja that I have done. Many hindus do deity puja, if they wish to do it then that is their beliefs. Many Hindu Sikhs do monotheistic beliefs, that is their beliefs also. Maybe dozen times now I have said monotheistic and polytheistic are faith-based conclusions and equally useless. You do not like this truth. Your personal belief is monotheism which If you know nothing of hindu atheism, which is obvious since you did not even know that it existed or even hindu monotheism for that matter as this is new information I taught you, then read couple books as you need them. I am not teacher of full time job to fix M Singh confusion. Other things in life important also. I have taught you previously regarding your lack of knowledge of even hindu population to use Google as tool, again use this tool and do not ask simpleton questions. I am at far more advanced level and this is waste of expertise. Do full research first, spend couple months learning subject, then happy to answer your foolish questions.

      • First you come up with ‘atheist Hindu’, now you come up with ‘Hindu Sikh’ hybrid. Atheist Hindu, polytheists Hindu and monotheist Hindu – what a potpourri mishmash of theological doctrine – is it any wonder the Dalits are so desperate to leave that contradictory dark ages thinking behind. You claim to be a Hindu but you do no deity worship then what are you praying to as ‘atheist Hindu’? Nothing? Animals? Ganga? What exactly? You don’t do puja either. Yes, that sounds like the behaviour of a Hindu, go to the mandir and just stand there staring into space. What a complete waste of time – you don’t believe in fantastical beasts but you want to associate yourself with belief system that centred around such mythology. What a moronic way to time pass. No such thing as a ‘Hindu Sikh with monotheistic beliefs’ either. Very definition of a Sikh is they believe in One God only; the very first line in Japji Sahib in the very first page of Gurbani states ‘Ik Onkar’ – ‘There is Only One God’. Hindus are welcome to come to the Gurdwaras if only for the free food like you but don’t call them ‘Hindu Sikhs’. If you go and visit the Vatican and have a good look around St Peter’s basilica you don’t call yourself a ‘Hindu Christian’. As for learning on google maybe you should try to look up Shiva and get in your big Atheist Hindu brain that Shiva never had any sword but a trishul. You have yet to admit that you stand corrected with your fundamental mistake claiming Shiva wielded a ‘khanda’ (which again is wrong as khanda is emblem not actual weapon). I also had to teach you about Jallianwala Bagh as you didnt seem to know what all Indians know that Gurkhas murdered in cold blood thousand innocent people including Hindus by the way as I know you are happy for Sikhs and Muslims to die in great numbers.

  6. If someone go please take photo, would love to see multi-colored pointy hats vs white pointy hats. Which color hats will win?

    • I was jokingly reasoning that the shape of your head was pointy to try and account for the bits of your brain which must be missing with all the stupid comments you have been making. The fact that I have to explain this to you means I was wrong to make the reasoning in jest and that there probably is something mentally wrong with you. As for me being Canadian child I have never been in Canada as Waheguru would attest if you had the sense to believe in Him. It is you who is probably a NRI Hindu with all the silly ill-informed and rather hysterical views you have posted when I come to think of it. You delight in the murder and rape of Indian citizens, instead of proposing Rajputs or the Maharattas as Hindu martial races as an Indian instinctively would you don’t seem to know that the Gurkhas are Nepalese and not Indians and have indeed blood on their trigger fingers for the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, proudly declare to being a parasite for eating ‘free food’ in Gurdwara langar when any Indian Hindu would never think that lowly and even have said The Hindus have fooled the world into thinking they are a peaceful religion – no Indian Hindu thinks they have ‘fooled’ the world but believe sincerely their religion is peaceful. You have even claimed the Sikh ‘khanda’ is a sword of Shiva which shows you don’t even know that ‘khanda’ is not a sword at all but military emblem of the Sikhs (two symbolic kirpans and the circular chakkar). Maybe you have seen it on a Nishan Sahib outside the Gurdwara where you to get free food? You were probably thinking of the word ‘kirpan’ which an Indian Hindu would readily know, certainly a Punjabi Hindu, but even then you are mistakingly putting this into the hand of Shiva who as any real Indian Hindu would know does not wield a sword at all but carries a trishul! You were probably thinking of Kali and the tulwars she carries in her many hands as that Goddess is depicted in western films where you live. Indiana Jones and temple of doom was banned here in India you know but you obviously got to see it in Canada, Uk or wherever you are from. Certainly you are from west with your rabid hatred towards Sikhs which is not common feature of the Hindus who live side by side with me here in India who hates corruption, nepotism and communalism as much as me. I think it is difficult for you to openly come out of cupboard in the west as Hindu because gora would make fun of your worshipping of animals, gods, goddesses, demons, stone idols, astrology and caste as those are pagan beliefs that western culture has abandoned. That is why I think you tell people you are atheist so you can be more accepted there but it causes conflict in you as you don’t have courage like the NRI Sikhs to proudly declare their faith no matter what. Is that why you resent the Sikhs, that they continue to do what you can’t and shame your inferiority complex? You then try to compensate by hating that which you secretly admire behind overblown superiority complex even though you are ignorant of Hindu religion and history from the ‘homeland’. There I have saved you lot dollars for psychological therapy you desperately need.

      • All your “reasoning” is a joke, your arguments are flawed and your evidence is false. You need a teacher to help you, thorough explanation of most basic things. Not worth anyone’s time.

      • Yes, I forgot you are not interested in reasoning, logic or rationale just pure ignorant prejudice informs your world view. But you don’t need a teacher you need a psychiatrist to treat your ravings and rantings. Why don;t you explain to me how you claim to be both a ‘monotheistic Hinud’ and an atheist at the same time? How you manage it. On the first day of week you go to mandir and rub belly of the hybrid mutant elephant boy and ask for money. Then next day you curse yourself for believing in deities and go out and rob a Sikh. Day after return to mandir and ask Ganesh for forgiveness for not believing in Him and thanking him for money then off to see Kali to ask her to satisfy your lust. Next day again you remonstrte with yourself for ever believing in deities once more and now havoing no belief in divinity you indulge your bestial nature because you fear no karmic consequences and go out and rape some woman, child or animal. Next day back to the mandir to beg forgiveness again? Is that how it goes? Sounds like schizophrenia to me or perhaps your desire for some veneer of religiosity is just a show of respectability and actually you are following the noted satanist Crowley’s ‘Do what thou wilt’ theosophy? After all you are already half there with your in / out belief in demons like Ravan, eh? And what do you do with your atheists monotheist Hindu belief on the seventh day? Take the day off, maybe dress in womens clothes and dance about like a khusra? That way you could again indulge your conflicted psychology by saying you are both gay and not gay at the same time. And what ‘sword’ Shiva wields again? That’s right, it is not sword but trishul, good little boy, you are learning something from your teacher.

    • Reasonable Soul on January 16, 2017 at 7:39 pm
      Yes yes yes. Ban these RSS fools. Ban every Hindu
      Reply
      M Singh January 17, 2017 at 4:20 am
      ‘Ban every Hindu’? Why? Why do you wish to discriminate against a majority for the sins of a minority who have hijacked their name and intend to exploit their sentiments to throw them back into dark ages? My Hindu cousins are as much victims of these RSS fascists as anybody – ask any Dalit or that poor couple in Chennai beaten up for not saluting the flag in a cinema.
      Reply
      Harinder January 17, 2017 at 9:11 pm
      Fanatic Sikh
      Fascist Sikh
      Reply
      M Singh January 18, 2017 at 5:42 am
      It is an oxymoron to call a Sikh a fanatic or a fascist as a Sikh cannot be either by definition. Reasonable Soul is not a Sikh at all and has been masquerading as one posting sly, nuanced support for the RSS over the past year by playing the part of a supposedly bigoted ‘Sikh’ which of course now allows RSS Harinder to try and connect words like fascist and fanatic to Sikh. Wouldn’t be at all surprised if these two agent provocateurs aren’t linked.
      Reply
      Reasonable Soul January 16, 2017 at 7:41 pm
      Hindus are not part of Punjab. They were never there.. Porus was an alien.
      Reply
      M Singh January 17, 2017 at 4:32 am
      Oh, I see now what you were actually meaning ‘Reasonable Soul’; it was not just a facetious comment against my Hindu cousins but a barbed jibe at Sikhs. I remember now you have posted snide support for the RSS before albeit far more subtly and nuanced than RSS Harinder. Why don’t you just come and say why you support the RSS and Hinduvta minded people? Try and make the case for pseudo religious cultural fascism instead of being sly and scornful. Of course Hindus are part of Punjab, nobody on this website has ever said otherwise. Most Sikhs are descended from Hindu bloodline if you go back hundreds of years. We feel no emnity towards our Hindu cousins but rather shock and dismay at the lack of solidarity with us starting with the RSS /Hinduvta taliban inspired, agitated for referendum in Punjab for self determination of Punjabi Hindus in 1966 where the majority of Punjabi Hindus forsook Punjab and mother tongue of Punjabi. Those who remained in Punjab and true to their homeland are loved by their Sikh cousins as our kinsmen but we fear they will fall prey to the communal minded RSS / Hinduvta nexus intent upon making them break those familial bonds as others have done before them.

      • M Singh: “It is an oxymoron to call a Sikh a fanatic or a fascist as a Sikh cannot be either by definition.” This has been said by some fanatic followers of every religion. Of course it is false but willfully ignorant will never agree.

      • I cannot reason with someone who just will not acknowledge facts but sees the world only through his own bigoted point of view. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. And to call me ignorant when you have displayed shocking levels of ignorance and prejudice in regards to Indian history and religion is pot calling kettle black hypocrisy. Tell me do you still contend the Gurkhas (who are natives of Nepal and not India) are prime examples of Hindu martial prowess after I have brought to your attention that they were the ones who committed the Jallianwala Bagh massacre blindly obeying orders of General Dyer and even today serve the Britishers in their foreign army?

      • British choosing Gurkha troops is your evidence of Gurkhas not having martial prowess? Think please. Everyone knows of Gurkha martial prowess, only you do not know. You insist that Sikhs are supermen better than everyone else. When I explain that Sikhs are just normal people, you take this as insult on you. Problem of egotism is alive and well in M Singh. Whether Gurkhas are native of Nepal or India make no difference, why you care? Nepal is another Hindu country of ours, where is country of Sikh supermen?

      • You think. Gurkhas choosing to wish to continue serving their once colonial overlords is evidence that martial prowess without moral code is useless. That is why they continued shoot unarmed civilians until all their ammunition was finished at Jallianwalah Bagh. Perhaps you approve of such merciless fighting men – the Waffen-SS probably appeal to equally for their brutality and spirit – who have no conscience to stop them committing crimes against humanity but we Sikhs prefer to have honour with our prowess. I do not insist Sikhs are supermen but unlike you I acknowledge their proud and glorious military past and present because they are a warrior people with nobility at their heart so lacking in your heroes. And as I said which of us won more battle honours for valour? The Sikhs.

      • If so many Sikhs at Jallianwala Bagh, how did Gurkhas win? Should have been overpowered by the “warrior people”. Truth is “warrior people” is British propaganda used to exploit Sikhs as the cannon fodder. Then you think medal given are proof of Sikh superiority. Proves only who is biggest cannon fodder fool, we Hindus use you also. Also Gurkhas are not only from Nepal, also from India, again you know not even basics. Question was of martial prowess, not moral code, therefore now you have brought in topic of moral code. This is M Singh reasoning. Waffen SS is long gone thanks to Indian Army efforts of mainly Hindu soldiers, also 10% Sikhs were there as minority.

      • You are really embarrassing yourself now with the amount of ignorance you are showing. Every Indian knows this but because you are a NRI Hindu you don’t. What do you mean ‘how did the Gurkhas win’? The Bagh was and is a large walled in garden full of civilians – Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus, even some animals – when the Gurkhas marched in through the only entrance and exit point which was too small to admit their machine gun vehicle. The Gurkhas opened fire with their Lee Enfield rifles and continued to shoot until all their bullets were spent under Dyer’s direction to shoot into the crowd. Sikhs wearing kirpans were at least thirty metres away from the line of your oh-so valiant Gurkhas who kept their kukris in their belts as they continued their rifle barrage. The Gurkhas never engaged in hand to hand combat but like automaton cowards shot civilians – men, women, children even animals. That’s how they ‘won’, you idiot. And now you claim the Nazis were defeated by Indian Army! Laughable! Look at the Victoria crosses won in second world war my friend and see how many were won by Sikhs whose population was a fraction of the Hindus. Even the Mussalman won more than you. But I understand why you don’t want to talk of moral code as you don’t have ethics; let’s face it with your support for the fascist RSS you were probably on the Nazis’ side.

      • Nepal defended by Gurkhas could not be taken by British. Khalsa Raj defended by Sikhs taken by British. What excuse will have for this one now also?

      • Do you know where Nepal is? It had zero strategic value because of its location. No invasion was possible north of Nepal because of Himalaya range and the Nepal Court was utterly beholden to the East India Company. Rani Jindan sought sanctuary in Nepal and the Rana had to place her in a state of penury at Dalhousie’s insistence. The Rana knew full well he could not stop the armies of the east india company and like so many colllaborator Hindu hill chiefs opted for treaties to keep them out. Khalksa Raj annexed by British because of high treachery of four men – all Hindu Dogras from Kashmir, Gulab, Dhian, Tej and Lal who conspired with East India Company and gave up our battle plans and withdrew support at critical junctures. Know the history before you talk of it.

      • I knew excuse was coming for Sikh failure and Hindu Gurkha success. Fact is British did try to conquer Nepal but failed due to superior Gurkha skills in hilly terrain. British destroyed Sikh Empire. Nepal outlast Sikh empire, Nepal still here. Sikh empire is gone, even British gone now but Sikh empire still not there and never to return. Nepal is sovereign country. Excuses are many, reality is one. Hindus have more strong forces, not just Gurkhas. Sikhs can be replace easy as happened during Sikh traitors in 80s who abandoned army posts. Most those traitor Sikhs got killed very quickly, even before their stolen trucks reached Amritsar already Sikh soldiers dead. Total fail on Sikh part.

      • The treaty of Sugauli gave the British East India Company control over 1/3rd of Nepalese territory, which meant control over coveted trade routes and hill stations and a commitment that Gurkha soldiers would be recruited in to EIC armies to help the Britishers conquer rest of Indian subcontinent. Nepal was a Chinese Client state in theory and China accepted high levels of autonomy in Nepal in exchange for the payment of token tribute money. This prompted British policy makers to recognise the threat of conflict between Chinese and British interests in the region and the strategic value of Nepal (also Bhutan and Sikkim) to act as buffer states. So the incentive to conquer Nepal further weakened, as time went by, by Chinese protectionism. particularly over wool trade, lack of valuable resources within Nepal and realisation of the enormous costs of fighting a war in a mountainous region in terms of finances and casualties. In other words the Britishers did not need to mount a full scale invasion because they were getting what they wanted from Nepal anyway. It wasn’t worth the money since Britain had secured a guarantee Nepal would not fight for any non-Nepalese nation except for Britain so no point upsetting them by trying a full scale invasion of their country. They would go onto use these Gurkhas that you are so proud of to subjugate other parts of Indian subcontinent and of course their great moment of glory they massacred over a thousand defenceless Indian civilians who had no means of escape at Jallianwala Bagh into bargain as well. As for Nepal is still here and sovereign country tell me why their Gurkhas are still fighting for British coin, lot of dignity they show serving once imperial masters even today. And you keep prattling on about Sikh failure then why are you still so afraid of Sikhs? The very spectre haunts you.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here