BREAKING: Bhai Paramjit Singh Pamma to Return to UK From Portugal

Indian Punjab is the Sikh Homeland historically, culturally and religiously; as such it cannot be replaced or forsaken by the Sikhs and is the reason why they fought so hard to keep it and can be expected to continue doing so. The Jews could not give up Israel even after centuries of occupation and genocidal persecution which saw most of them forced out of their homeland. We are no different.

You keep drip feeding the poison mantra and never actually respond to either my answers or questions (Will India’s ‘Law makers/breakers’ send those two Punjabi Policeman back to Portugal to face justice and the allegations made against them of torturing Paramjit?) so I will just paraphrase what I have already said to you many times before for the sake of new readers who you might be trying to take in with your RSS propaganda. ‘You are looking at the wrong causality, Bhindranwale died in 1984 but the injustices against Sikhs started decades before that when promises and assurances given to Sikhs to join India (and reject the setting up of their own Sikh state) by Nehru and the Congress Party were reneged upon. The sharing of state capital (Chandigarh) between two states, the redistribution of river water( it is not sharing but theft when you don’t even seek let alone get the Punjab’s Sikhs permission (no referendum offered to them on this issue yet in 1966 the Hindus of Punjab got a referendum to abon their mother tongue and form another state out of Punjab’s territory) and against riparian conventions), the denial of a Sikh marriage act recognising the Anand Karaj (which effectively meant that Sikhs were being counted as Hindus), the rejection of Punjabi as the language of Punjab, the cleaving off of Punjab’s land to form another state territory with Haryana, etc – the grievances are well documented in the Anandpur Sahib Resolutions formulated in the sixties and seventies. The truth of what I am telling about communal causality is further demonstrated in the 1992 Bombay and 2002 anti Muslim ‘riots’ – these events would not have occurred had the apparent acceptibility of collective punishment of a religious minority been set in precedent with the anti Sikh pogroms of 1984. That communal intolerance to religious minorities is how India and Pakistan were born and it is an underlying problem that Hindus (as they form a majority in the Indian subcontinent and it is always incumbent on the ruling people whether they be white South African or Hindu Indian) have to be big enough to recognise and be magnanimous enough to resolve for the sake of the greater good. The integrity (not to mention honour and morality) of the Nation would be guaranteed by this carrot approach rather than the stick which always fails in the end and only leads to bloodshed and suffering of innocents. Everything was not fine and happy before 1980 – I have already told you time and again about growing Sikh grievances from 1947 when it became clearer and clearer that Nehru and the established Sarkar were reneging on promises made to SIkhs before Independece (to entice them to join India rather Pakistan or re-create their own sovereign SIkh State) that culminated in the demands of the Anandpur Sahib Resolutions. Instead of addressing those genuine grievances Sikhs were continually rebuffed – the 1966 seccession of Punkani Hindus abandoning both their mother tongue Punjabi and state Punjab for Hindi and the creation of Haryana with all the attendant subsequent issues surrounded unfair channelling of Punjab water without Sikh consent (who were the majority in an agrarian dependent Punjab) right up to the murder of Sikhs by Nirankari’s back by Indira Gandhi (did I mention she also instigated an illegal and draconian state of emergency in India from 1975 to 1977 in response to being found guilty of fraud by a court)
The Nirankaris are a heretical sect which were first supported by the British in their divide and rule policy to try and neuter the Sikhs pre-independence. Indira Gandhi resurrected this policy for exactly the same nefarious reason during the 1970s as her Congress Party could not overhaul the Sikh political party at that time the Akali Dal through the ballot box. The Sikhs had been peacefully demanding their rights from Independence in 1947 as it became clearer that Nehru having wooed / bamboozled Master Tara ISngh and SIkh leadership into siding with India (instead of Pakistan or re-establishing their own sovereign Sikh state such as the Khalsa Raj of Maharajah Ranjit Singh which encompassed territory from Kashmir, Punjab (north of the Sutlej) and lands up to the Khyber) had no intention of honouring promises made. This lack of faith from Nehru led to the Anandpur Sahib Resolutions to address Sikh grievances over two decades before Bhindranwale even came on the scene although you are correct to note that the murders of innocent SIkhs by the state sponsored and protected Nirankaris led to Sikh backlash. You are incorrect however to continually raise spectre of Empire’s armies – the British Empire was and is dead and had no involvement whatsover in oppressing Sikhs in Punjab during the 1970s, 1980s or 1990s. You persist in presenting Bhindranwale as a bogeyman when he was really a marginal figure (until Indira Gandhi made the catastrophic mistake you are making in thinking Sikhs can be puppeteered) who was made into a shaheed of the Sikh Quam by being martryed – if there really was a need to arrest him why was he arrested and then released beforehand and why not the Darbar Sahib surrounded by Sikh soldiers (who were in actuality largely confined to barracks) and its water and electricity cut off and the thousands of pilgrims visiting the Darbar Sahib that day allowed to leave? As a direct consequence of the illegal polices of the State towards SIkhs in the Punjab with kidnapping, false arrest, harassment of relatives, fake encounters, torture, rapes, extra judicial killings (just see what one of the men who did these things admits to – Gurmeet Pinky) compare what has happened to the Punjab from 1980 to present day. Back then Punjab was bread basket of India now it is on the verge of bankruptcy (whilst its BJP stooges the Badals have engorged and enriched themselves to the point where they are running out of Swiss banks to deposit their spoils from monopolies, patronage and alleged involvement in drug trafficking), its ground water is heavily polluted (not just by pesticides but by uranium when the PUnjab does not even possess a single nuclear power plant) which correlates with a proportional rise in both infant mortality, genetic abnormalities and disabilities in newborns, the State has the highest rate both of female infanticide and drug addiction in India (the latter is particularly galling when you consider the border with Pakistan is the most heavily defended) and to top it all Sikh scriptures are being torn in the streets of the Sikh homeland and when Sikhs protest they are in turn shot dead by police officers who are in turn absolved of any culpability. Not to mention the massive migration of Sikh youth out of the country. None of these things were happening in Punjab up to 1984. The fact that the State and PUnjab Government made Punjab into a police state is not excusable by saying that the human rights and civil rights abuses that then then subsequently ensued against the SIkhs was inevitable (as whenever governments create police states such abuses occur) as those politicians, those police officers, those army personnel, those judges et al were all fellow Indian citizens and should have treated Sikhs as their brothers. The sadistic and illegal treatment the SIkhs were subjected to (the legacy of which continues to this very day) is not excusable and those who engaged in it should be brought to book not because of the Geneva conventions (which apply to war combatants) but because of human rights violations and crimes against humanity. The wholesale pogrom against Sikhs has nothing to do with Bhindranwale (pretending to be a Sikh on this website you should at least try and make the effort to spell his name correct just once) and again you are trying to draw some justified correlation between the deaths of dozens of Hindus (no women or children amongst them) against the organised slaughter of thousands of SIkhs by criminals who were never punished but instead rewarded by police, judiciary and politicians even to this day. As for your contention that ‘Bhindranwale’s boys indulged in illegal killings tell me how many non SIkhs (and lets be honest as a RSS member you wouldn’t care if these were Christian or Muslims) were killed in PUnjab by Bhindranwale (and if were guilty why was he arrested, taken to a police station and then released without charge?) were burned to death with tyres about their necks, how many orphans thrown into fires to burn alive, how many women gang raped, how many homes and businesses torched with people inside them, how many scalped and stabbed as they were dragged off trains, how many were kidnapped in borad daylight, how many tortured and murdered and cremated by policemen and army men – the answer is zero so stop trying to draw some kind of equivalence as the two crimes are not comparable in scale. I think you and your RSS buddies should build Punjab elsewhere in universe and as India now has a space programme (at the expense of providing education and social welfare for the millions who die on the street every year) I would be willing to pay for your ticket to be on that rocket. The only people who have caused irreparable damage to Punjab are genocide apologists and those who seek to both refute and rewrite historical facts – that means you as a drunkard cannot address his alcoholism until he is ready to admit he has a drinking problem (this does not mean he blames it on the barman for serving him).

Parmajit has broken no law – he has NOT been convicted of ANY crime in ANY country of the world. The crime India accuses him of is one where all his co-defendants were acquitted and a crime that they were not able to substantiate with EVIDENCE to convince an impartial judicial court (even upon the second time of asking) to extradict Parmajit. IN fact the so called ‘evidence’ was historically so flimsy and suspect that the UK Government (which has been very ready to sacrifice Sikh civil rights for good relations with India) gave him asylum status so convinced were they that he would be tortured if returned to India – possibly by the same two Punjab ‘police officers’ despatched to collect him from Portugal! How can you not be incensed at such a catalogue of clear injustice and religious persecution?! In the words of the song ‘If you tolerate this, then your children will be next, your children will be next’.
‘India is a law abiding peaceful country and we shall book all Law breakers’ – except those who commit extrajudicial kidnappings, torture and murder (even those who want to confess such Gurmeet Pinky let alone those who do not – Sumedh Saini et al) and those who commit genocide (Kamal Nath, Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler etc all free to live in their old home in India), eh Harinder? ‘India is a law abiding peaceful country and we shall book all Law breakers’ – in the land where up is down, black is white, right is wrong and good is evil we must remember Hitler’s favourite philosopher Nietzsche who stated ‘if you can get a people to believe in an absurdity you can then make them commit an atrocity’. I despair at your delusions and what such smug intolerance and prejudice is doing to my country in the name of so-called ‘nationalism’.

How is he a law breaker – he has NOT been found GUILTY of committing any crime in any court (if kangeroo Indian Court) yet?! You are just proving the adage that if you are a Sikh you are presumed guilty and have to prove your innocence in India. That is totally unacceptable and unconstitutional. Tell me will India’s Law makers (read Law breakers) be extradicting the two police officers who ran back to India on the charges of torture that the Portuguese had to put forward? They will at least be presumed innocent until proven guilty. And it is NOT small victory for British Sikhs you silly RSS dog it is a massive win for the entire Sikh kaum – every Sikh is proud what has been achieved bypassing so-called Sikh leaders like the SGPC and Akali Badal who have proven to be irrelevant to Sikh interests.