Gurmeet Pinky Makes A U-turn: Says Was Forced To Make His Revelations

Godse was NOT a nationalist and should NOT be mentioned in the same breath as Bhagat Singh. Godse was a member of terrorist RSS which is a racist organisation that believes in Hinduvta superiority. The rest of your Blame it all on the Empire rubbish has been discredited elsewhere many times

So no Indians whatsoever attacked the Durbar Shaib. Not Indira Gandhi, not Brar. No Indians attacked Gurdwaras all across Punjab at the same. No Indians ejected media from the Punjab and sealed it to create a police state. No Indians tortured SIkhs, disappeared and murdered them. No Indians went around inciting hatred towards Sikhs, no Indians gave out Sikh names and addresses, no Indians disarmed Sikhs, no Indians murdered, raped and tortured Sikhs over 4 days in capitol city. No Indians depsite all the eye witness accounts, photos and reports. No Indians involved. Indira Gandhi innocent. Rajiv Gandhi innocent. Congress Party and BJP innocent. All Indians so innocent. Guilty are just ghosts from foreign parts somewhere. No Indians. And why? Your reasoning is they are absolved of all guilt because they are too stupid to be guilty. They have to be told what to do otherwise they are incapable of thinking for themselves let alone acting for themselves. What the hell did they go and get Independence for if as you contend they are incapable of making rational decisions? The first step for an alcoholic recover form their alcoholism to to accept he an alcoholic. Until and unless he accepts he has a problem there is no hope of recovery. Similarly India and people like you are living in denial by not taking responsibility (and passing the buck to foreign existential forces) for the actions, the atrocities committed in the name of the State of India against its own citizens. By the way it is thanks to Julian Assange that we have the US embassy’s leaked intelligence cables from Delhi in 1984 which detail the culpability of the Congress Party Officials and state organised pogrom against the Sikhs (which involves the Indian police culpability over 4 days of inaction). No one on this website is listening to your attempts to airbrush history. We know who the guilty were in 1984 and who are still apologising for them now – Indians then and Indians now.

‘Never will we hand the reigns (it’s actually reins) of Punjab to people with violent mindset’ – you have the Punjab Police (who rehire policemen convicted of violent crime and have a secret fund to defend others accused of extra judicial crimes) and the RSS/BJP backed Akali Badal Party in charge now today! Again you are looking at the wrong causality, Bhindranwale died in 1984 but the injustices against Sikhs started decades before that when promises and assurances given to Sikhs to join India (and reject the setting up of their own Sikh state) by Nehru and the Congress Party were reneged upon. The sharing of state capital (Chandigarh) between two states (one of which was created artificially Haryana in 1966 when Punjabi Hindus were given a referendum to secede from Punjab and abandon Punjabi mother tongue for Hindi) , the redistribution of river water (without Punjabi peoples assent and against riparian principles this is called theft not sharing), the denial of a Sikh marriage act recognising the Anand Karaj (which effectively meant that Sikhs were being counted as Hindus), the rejection of Punjabi as the language of Punjab, the cleaving off of Punjab’s land to form another state territory with Haryana, etc – the grievances are well documented in the Anandpur Sahib Resolutions formulated in the sixties and seventies. The truth of what I am telling about communal causality is further demonstrated in the 1992 Bombay and 2002 anti Muslim ‘riots’ – these events would not have occurred had the apparent acceptibility of collective punishment of a religious minority been set in precedent with the anti Sikh pogroms of 1984. That communal intolerance to religious minorities is how India and Pakistan were born and it is an underlying problem that Hindus (as they form a majority in the Indian subcontinent and it is always incumbent on the ruling people whether they be white South African or Hindu Indian) have to be big enough to recognise and be magnanimous enough to resolve for the sake of the greater good. The integrity (not to mention honour and morality) of the Nation would be guaranteed by this carrot approach rather than the stick which always fails in the end and only leads to bloodshed and suffering of innocents. Indira Gandhi was found guilty of fraud by an Indian Court but rather than protest her innocence legally she illegally declared a state of emergency and imprisoned political opponents and neutered the news media and engaged in anti social campaigns against the Indian populace such as forced sterilisation (which disproportionately targeted the poor particularly the so-called untouchable class in Hindu society. Her image was so badly damaged and the political resistance to her was notably great from Punjab so she engineered a confrontation with the Sikhs in order to prove to the Indian electorate that she was still a strong leader in the run up to general elections. She then committed effectively an act of treason by going cap in hand to the former imperialist power Britain (who shaheeds Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh had given their lives fighting against) and asking for military assistance to plan an armed assault on the Darbar Sahib! The British PM Margaret Thatcher – keen to put through the sale of a defunct British aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal to India – was more than happy to help and dispatched a SAS (elite special forces) Major to India to plan such an assault in January 1984 – a full six months before the attack. This plan was not in the end used but the point is Indira Gandhi asked a foreign former imperialist Government to help plan the killing of Indian citizens on Indian soil – this is beyond dispute as luckily the British have a 30 year policy of revealing cabinet documents. ‘Harinder’ persists in presenting Bhindranwale as a bogeyman when he was really a marginal figure who was made into a shaheed of the Sikh Quam by being martryed – if there really was a need to arrest him why was he arrested and then released beforehand and why not the Darbar Sahib surrounded by Sikh soldiers (who were in actuality largely confined to barracks) and its water and electricity cut off and the thousands of pilgrims visiting the Darbar Sahib that day allowed to leave? As a direct consequence of the illegal polices of the State towards SIkhs in the Punjab with kidnapping, false arrest, harassment of relatives, fake encounters, torture, rapes, extra judicial killings compare what has happened to the Punjab from 1980 to present day. Back then Punjab was bread basket of India now it is on the verge of bankruptcy (whilst its BJP stooges the Badals have engorged and enriched themselves to the point where they are running out of Swiss banks to deposit their spoils from monopolies, patronage and alleged involvement in drug trafficking), its ground water is heavily polluted (not just by pesticides but by uranium when the PUnjab does not even possess a single nuclear power plant) which correlates with a proportional rise in both infant mortality, genetic abnormalities and disabilities in newborns, the State has the highest rate both of female infanticide and drug addiction in India (the latter is particularly galling when you consider the border with Pakistan is the most heavily defended) and to top it all Sikh scriptures are being torn in the streets of the Sikh homeland and when Sikhs protest they are in turn shot dead by police officers who are in turn absolved of any culpability. Not to mention the massive migration of Sikh youth out of the country. None of these things were happening in Punjab up to 1984. The Nirankaris are a heretical sect which were first supported by the British in their divide and rule policy to try and neuter the Sikhs pre-independence. Indira Gandhi resurrected this policy for exactly the same nefarious reason during the 1970s as her Congress Party could not overhaul the Sikh political party at that time the Akali Dal through the ballot box. The Sikhs had been peacefully demanding their rights from Independence in 1947 as it became clearer that Nehru having wooed / bamboozled Master Tara Singh and SIkh leadership into siding with India (instead of Pakistan or re-establishing their own sovereign Sikh state such as the Khalsa Raj of Maharajah Ranjit Singh which encompassed territory from Kashmir, Punjab (north of the Sutlej) and lands up to the Khyber) had no intention of honouring promises made. This lack of faith from Nehru led to the Anandpur Sahib Resolutions to address Sikh grievances over two decades before Bhindranwale even came on the scene although you are correct to note that the murders of innocent SIkhs by the state sponsored and protected Nirankaris led to Sikh backlash. The sadistic and illegal treatment the SIkhs were subjected to (the legacy of which continues to this very day) is not excusable and those who engaged in it should be brought to book not because of the Geneva conventions (which apply to war combatants) but because of human rights violations and crimes against humanity.